Gaussian processes by convolution of noise with smoothing kernels, which is a kind of dual to defining them through covariances.

This is especially interesting because it can be made computationally convenient (we can enforce locality) and non-stationarity.

## Convolutions with respect to a non-stationary driving noise

A convenient representation of a GP model uses process convolutions (Barry and Hoef 1996; Dave Higdon 2002; Thiebaux and Pedder 1987). One may construct a Gaussian process \(z(\mathbf{s})\) over a region \(\mathcal{S}\) by convolving a continuous, unit variance, white noise process \(x(\mathbf{s}),\) with a smoothing kernel \(k(\mathbf{s}):\) \[ z(\mathbf{s})=\int_{\mathcal{S}} k(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{s}) x(\mathbf{u}) d \mathbf{u} \]

If we take \(x(\mathbf{s})\) to be an intrinsically stationary process with variogram \(\gamma_{x}(\mathbf{d})=\operatorname{Var}(x(\mathbf{s})-\) \(x(\mathbf{s}+\mathbf{d}))\) the resulting variogram of the process \(z(\mathbf{s})\) is given by \[ \gamma_{z}(\mathbf{d})=\gamma_{z}^{*}(\mathbf{d})-\gamma_{z}^{*}(\mathbf{0}) \text { where } \gamma_{z}^{*}(\mathbf{q})=\int_{\mathcal{S}} \int_{\mathcal{S}} k(\mathbf{v}-\mathbf{q}) k(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{v}) \gamma_{x}(\mathbf{u}) d \mathbf{u} d \mathbf{v} \] …With this approach, one can fix the smoothing kernel \(k(\mathbf{s})\) and then modify the spatial dependence for \(z(\mathbf{s})\) by controlling \(\gamma_{x}(\mathbf{d}) .\)

## Varying convolutions with respect to a stationary white noise

e.g. Dave Higdon, Swall, and Kern (1999); David Higdon (1998). Alternatively we can fix the driving noise and vary the smoothing kernel. TBC.

## References

*The Geometry of Random Fields*. SIAM ed. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

*Random Fields and Geometry*. Springer Monographs in Mathematics 115. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48116-6.

*Applications of Random Fields and Geometry Draft*. https://robert.net.technion.ac.il/files/2016/08/hrf1.pdf.

*Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics*1 (3): 297–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/1400521.

*The Annals of Applied Statistics*5 (1): 523–50. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-AOAS383.

*Quantitative Methods for Current Environmental Issues*, edited by Clive W. Anderson, Vic Barnett, Philip C. Chatwin, and Abdel H. El-Shaarawi, 37–56. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0657-9_2.

*Bayesian Statistics*6 (1): 761–68.

*Environmental and Ecological Statistics*5 (2): 173–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009666805688.

*Technometrics*44 (3): 230–41. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017002188618419.

*Statistical Modelling*5 (1): 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1191/1471082X05st085oa.

*Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology)*73 (4): 423–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x.

*arXiv:1703.02112 [stat]*, November. http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.02112.

*London and Orlando, FL, Academic Press, 1987, 308*.

## No comments yet. Why not leave one?